From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Vogelpohl

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 24, 1982
326 N.W.2d 635 (Minn. 1982)

Summary

finding murder particularly cruel when victim was struck on the head at least eight times with two different hammers and defendant put paper in victim's mouth to mask dying sounds

Summary of this case from State v. Minick

Opinion

No. 82-343.

November 24, 1982.

Appeal from the District Court, Brown County, Miles B. Zimmerman, J.

C. Paul Jones, Public Defender and Lawrence Hammerling, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, R.T. Rodenberg, County Atty., New Ulm, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of second-degree murder based on a guilty plea. The appeal raises only the sentencing issue, specifically, whether the trial court erred in imposing a sentence of 180 months when the presumptive sentence for this offense (severity level X) by a person with defendant's criminal history score (zero) is 116 (111-121) months in prison. We affirm.

It would serve no useful purpose to summarize in detail the facts leading to the prosecution of defendant. The defendant committed the crime in a particularly cruel way, hitting the victim on the head at least eight times with two different hammers and then stuffing her mouth with paper so that he would not have to listen to her dying sounds. Our examination of the record satisfies us that the sentencing court's reliance upon this aggravating factor supports its deviation from the presumptive sentence. Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary, II.D.2.b(2) (1982). Because of this conclusion, there is no need for us to consider the validity or applicability of the other aggravating factors relied upon by the sentencing court. No issue is raised as to the scope of departure, the sentence being within the general limit of double the presumptive duration established in State v. Evans, 311 N.W.2d 481 (Minn. 1981).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Vogelpohl

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 24, 1982
326 N.W.2d 635 (Minn. 1982)

finding murder particularly cruel when victim was struck on the head at least eight times with two different hammers and defendant put paper in victim's mouth to mask dying sounds

Summary of this case from State v. Minick

finding murder particularly cruel when victim hit on head at least eight times with two different hammers and defendant put paper in victim's mouth to mask dying sounds

Summary of this case from State v. Lafountaine

upholding upward departure where victim was hit on the head eight times with two different hammers

Summary of this case from State v. Musse

affirming upward departure based on particular cruelty where defendant killed the victim by repeatedly hitting the victim on the head with two different hammers and stuffing her mouth with paper

Summary of this case from Dominguez v. State

affirming a durational departure based on the factor of particular cruelty where the defendant was convicted of second-degree murder after repeatedly hitting the victim on the head with hammers and stuffing her mouth with paper

Summary of this case from Kettle v. State

hitting victim on the head at least eight times with two different hammers and stuffing victim's mouth with paper so as not to hear victim's dying sounds was particularly cruel

Summary of this case from State v. Hanson
Case details for

State v. Vogelpohl

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Bradley H. VOGELPOHL, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 24, 1982

Citations

326 N.W.2d 635 (Minn. 1982)

Citing Cases

State v. White

In fact, similar circumstances have justified upward durational departures in other cases. See State v.…

State v. Stephani

As noted by the State, defendant's choice of tool was not a knife designed to cut, but a Phillips…