From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Toffolio

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 9, 1977
349 So. 2d 174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. EE-200.

March 9, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Susan H. Black, J.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Wallace E. Allbritton, Donald K. Rudser and Charles F. McClamma, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Giles P. Lewis, Joseph S. Farley and Bartley K. Vickers of Mahon, Farley Vickers, Jacksonville, for appellees.


The State appeals from an interlocutory order granting appellees' motions to suppress as evidence the marijuana taken from their vehicle in a warrantless search. Acting on suspicion that appellees were dumping garbage illegally, an officer approached their vehicle, which was parked in a vacant lot next to the highway. At the vehicle, the officer smelled marijuana. He searched for it, seized it and arrested appellees for possession of it.

Appellees did not claim to have any interest in the vacant lot creating an expectation of privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment. The officer was privileged to approach the vehicle. Once there, the smell of marijuana emanating from the vehicle justified searching the vehicle and seizing the marijuana. Berry v. State, 316 So.2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); State v. Boyle, 326 So.2d 225 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Mattson v. State, 328 So.2d 246 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

REVERSED.

MILLS, Acting C.J., and ERVIN, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Toffolio

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 9, 1977
349 So. 2d 174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Toffolio

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. DAVID A. TOFFOLIO AND RUSSELL L…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 9, 1977

Citations

349 So. 2d 174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

State v. Drake

Entirely different questions arise as to the subsequent search conducted outside the truck by the deputy and…

Lopez v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed.2d 543 (1925), adopted by…