State v. T.N. (In re T.N.)

Full title: In the Matter of T.N., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE of…

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Apr 23, 2014

323 P.3d 997 (Or. Ct. App. 2014)

262 Or. App. 499

Opinion

C130059MC; A155433.

2014-04-23

In the Matter of T.N., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. T.N., Appellant.

Washington County Circuit Court. James Lee Fun, Jr., Judge. Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Sarah M. Villanueva, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Washington County Circuit Court.
James Lee Fun, Jr., Judge.
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Sarah M. Villanueva, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before DUNCAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and LAGESEN, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days pursuant to ORS 426.130. Appellant argues, among other contentions, that the trial court plainly erred by failing to advise her of the right to subpoena witnesses under ORS 426.100(1)(d). See State v. M.L.R., 256 Or.App. 566, 570–71, 303 P.3d 954 (2013) (holding that the “failure to provide a person with all of the information required by ORS 426.100(1) constitutes an egregious error that justifies plain error review”). The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and, for the reasons set forth in M.L.R., exercise our discretion to correct the error.

Reversed.