From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thomas

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 15, 1991
584 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-263.

August 15, 1991.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County; Thomas Ellinor, Judge.

Joseph R. Boyd and William H. Branch of Boyd Branch, P.A., Chriss Walker, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Tallahassee, for appellants.

No appearance for appellee.


The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) and Marie Varner, who seeks increased child support for her minor child, challenge the trial court's order dismissing their petition for modification and denying standing to HRS. We reverse.

In light of the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Thaysen v. Thaysen, 583 So.2d 663 (Florida Supreme Court 1991), subsequent to entry of the order appealed, it is now apparent that the trial court erred. The Thaysen court held that HRS attorneys may be used in all child support proceedings, including modifications, without regard to eligibility of the moving party for public assistance or the lack of delinquency in current payments.

We therefore reverse the order and remand for proceedings consistent herewith.

JOANOS, C.J., and BARFIELD, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Thomas

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 15, 1991
584 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

State v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 15, 1991

Citations

584 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)