In Taylor, Mr. Seise gave the prosecutor every indication that he was very busy, yet cooperative, and he never expressed unwillingness to submit to a defense interview.
Summary of this case from State v. WilsonNo. 48522-9-I.
May 13, 2002.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 00-1-06001-3, Michael S. Spearman, J., entered March 7, 2001.
Reversed by unpublished opinion per Becker, C.J., concurred in by Coleman and Kennedy, JJ.
In Taylor, Mr. Seise gave the prosecutor every indication that he was very busy, yet cooperative, and he never expressed unwillingness to submit to a defense interview.
Summary of this case from State v. WilsonIn Taylor, the defense waited until February 20, 2001, to inform the prosecutor on the record that Seise still had not been interviewed.
Summary of this case from State v. WilsonFull title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant , v. DEMETRIUS TAYLOR Respondent
Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Date published: May 13, 2002
The State appealed and, in an unpublished opinion, Division One of the Court of Appeals reversed because…
State v. Livnat149 Wn.2d 1. In both Wilson and the case consolidated with it, State v. Taylor, noted at 111 Wn.App.…