From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Tanner

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 22, 2003
190 Or. App. 299 (Or. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

990231447; A111473.

Argued and submitted September 30, 2003.

Filed: October 22, 2003.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County. William C. Snouffer, Judge.

Jennelle Meeks Hall, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was David E. Groom, Acting Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Services. Willie Laron Tanner filed the supplemental brief pro se.

Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Solicitor General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and LEESON, Judge pro tempore.


PER CURIAM.

Sentence on count 9 vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Defendant appeals his convictions for a number of felonies, making multiple assignments of error. We reject his contentions with one exception, his sentence on count 9, kidnapping in the first degree. We remand for resentencing.

The court sentenced defendant to two upward departures on count 9, which in his case resulted in a minimum sentence of 260 months. However, the crime is a class A felony with a maximum sentence of 20 years, or 240 months. The state concedes that the sentence that the court imposed exceeds what the statute permits. Although defendant did not object at the time of sentencing, the error is apparent on the face of the record, and we exercise our discretion to review it. See State v. Remme , 173 Or. App. 546, 565-66, 23 P.3d 374 (2001).

Sentence on count 9 vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Tanner

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 22, 2003
190 Or. App. 299 (Or. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Tanner

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIE LARON TANNER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 22, 2003

Citations

190 Or. App. 299 (Or. Ct. App. 2003)
78 P.3d 132

Citing Cases

State v. Tanner

The facts material to our review are undisputed. Defendant was convicted following a jury trial of…

State v. Tanner

PER CURIAM. Defendant seeks reconsideration of our previous decision in this case, State v. Tanner, 190 Or.…