From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Suter

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 25, 2001
34 P.3d 169 (Or. 2001)

Opinion

(CC 96-1052; CA A95862; S.C. S48779)

Filed: October 25, 2001

On petition for review filed August 21, 2001.

Appeal from Clackamas County Circuit Court, Robert R. Selander, Judge. 157 Or. App. 107, 969 P.2d 1035 (1998).

Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. With her on the petition was David E. Groom, State Public Defender.

No appearance contra.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, LEESON, RIGGS, and De MUNIZ, Justices.

Balmer, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of State v. Fugate , 332 Or. 195, 26 P.3d 802 (2001).


Summaries of

State v. Suter

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 25, 2001
34 P.3d 169 (Or. 2001)
Case details for

State v. Suter

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. STEVEN MICHAEL SUTER, Petitioner…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 25, 2001

Citations

34 P.3d 169 (Or. 2001)
34 P.3d 169

Citing Cases

State v. Suter

Filed: February 13, 2002 On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, State v. Suter, 332 Or. 629, 34 P.3d 169…