From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Summers

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District
Feb 23, 1972
477 S.W.2d 721 (Mo. Ct. App. 1972)

Summary

In State v. Summers, 477 S.W.2d 721, 722 (Mo.App. 1972), it was held that where the record shows that the court attempted to sentence the defendant before the filing and ruling on defendant's motion for a new trial the assessment of sentence was premature and void as being made prior to the filing and ruling on the motion for new trial.

Summary of this case from City of St. Louis v. Richardson

Opinion

No. 34236.

February 23, 1972.

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL CORRECTION, CITY OF ST. LOUIS, RICHARD J. BROWN, J.

Michael J. Ebeling, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

Thomas W. Shannon, Pros. Atty., James I. Bucher, Asst. Pros. Atty., St. Louis, for plaintiff-respondent.


Defendant appeals his conviction following a jury waived trial. The defendant was found guilty of the failure to support "his child" who was under the age of 16 years.

Section 559.353, RSMo., V.A.M.S. — a misdemeanor.

After defendant rested his case, the court stated: "I'm going to find him guilty and sentence him to six months in the City Workhouse and I'll grant him probation." Defendant immediately filed a "Motion for a New Trial or for Outright Reversal and Acquittal," which was overruled. Thereafter, defendant filed his notice of appeal to this court.

There is no showing here that the defendant was ever sentenced or that a final judgment of conviction was entered after the motion for a new trial was overruled. On the contrary, the record here shows that the court attempted to sentence the defendant before the filing and ruling on defendant's motion for a new trial. This attempt sentencing was premature and void as being made prior to the filing and ruling on the motion for a new trial. State v. Jaeger, Mo., 394 S.W.2d 347 [10-14]; State v. Grimes, Mo.App., 470 S.W.2d 4; State v. Ezell, Mo.App., 470 S.W.2d 162; Criminal Rule 27.20, V.A.M.R.

We have no jurisdiction to hear this appeal in the absence of a final judgment in the trial court. There is nothing from which an appeal can be taken. State v. Chase, Mo., 415 S.W.2d 731 [1-3].

The submission of this cause on appeal must be set aside and the case remanded to the trial court with directions to properly sentence the defendant and render a final judgment. The defendant will then have the right to appeal from the judgment. State v. Chase, supra.

BRADY, C. J., and SMITH and WEIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Summers

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District
Feb 23, 1972
477 S.W.2d 721 (Mo. Ct. App. 1972)

In State v. Summers, 477 S.W.2d 721, 722 (Mo.App. 1972), it was held that where the record shows that the court attempted to sentence the defendant before the filing and ruling on defendant's motion for a new trial the assessment of sentence was premature and void as being made prior to the filing and ruling on the motion for new trial.

Summary of this case from City of St. Louis v. Richardson
Case details for

State v. Summers

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RALPH SUMMERS…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District

Date published: Feb 23, 1972

Citations

477 S.W.2d 721 (Mo. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

State v. Jacobs

Hauser, 101 S.W.3d at 321;Morrison, 94 S.W.3d at 449.Goth relies on Wren, which relies on State v. Summers,…

State v. Wren

The judgment and sentence rendered and pronounced by the trial court before the time expired for defendant to…