From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sullivan

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Nov 12, 1919
184 P. 921 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)

Opinion

No. A-3315.

Opinion Filed November 12, 1919.

Appeal from County Court, Bryan County; Lewis Paullin, Judge.

Henry Sullivan and Boss Neal were charged by indictment with the crime of conspiracy. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the indictment, the State appeals. Dismissed.

S.P. Freeling, Atty. Gen., W.C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chas. P. Abbott, Co. Atty., and Utterback MacDonald, for the State.

Hatchett Ferguson, for defendants in error.


In this case the state appeals from a judgment rendered in the county court of Bryan county, sustaining a demurrer to an indictment charging Henry Sullivan and Boss Neal with the crime of conspiracy.

It appears from the record that the trial court, in rendering judgment sustaining the demurrer to the indictment, made no order authorizing the matter to be submitted to another grand jury or directing that the defendants be prosecuted by information. A petition in error was filed in this court on April 6, 1918, and no brief has been filed by the county attorney or special prosecutors. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved that the appeal be dismissed; that for the reasons stated the attempted prosecution is at an end, and "this case presents only an academic or moot question, involving only an elementary principle of pleading, which would not justify this office in filing a brief solely in support of it."

The appeal herein is therefore dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Sullivan

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Nov 12, 1919
184 P. 921 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)
Case details for

State v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. HENRY SULLIVAN et al

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 12, 1919

Citations

184 P. 921 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)
16 Okla. Crim. 719

Citing Cases

Woodburn v. Pesi

(2) There is no testimony to the effect that the work done tended towards the development of the claims.…

Tobin v. Seaborn

rred to in the proceedings taken and had on the motions, this court is bound to assume that the omitted…