From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Stewart

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Sep 20, 1984
453 So. 2d 1251 (La. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. CR83-650.

June 27, 1984. Writ Granted September 20, 1984.

APPEAL FROM 7TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CATAHOULA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE W.C. FALKENHEINER, J.

Samuel Thomas, Tallulah, for defendant-appellant.

John F. Johnson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Harrisonburg, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before DOMENGEAUX, FORET and STOKER, JJ.


Defendant, Samuel Stewart, was charged by bill of information with possession of marijuana, with intent to distribute, in violation of LSA-R.S. 40:966 A(1).

After trial before a jury of twelve, defendant was found guilty as charged. The defendant was sentenced to serve ten years at hard labor and pay a fine of $15,000.00, plus court costs.

Although defendant has filed a brief containing two allegations of error, he failed to file any assignments of error with the trial court. Allegations of error not embodied in a formal assignment of error and appearing for the first time in a defendant's brief are not properly before a reviewing court. State v. Spears, 350 So.2d 603 (La. 1977); LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 844. Therefore, this case is reviewable only for errors discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings, and without inspection of the evidence. LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 920; State v. Jackson, 332 So.2d 211 (La. 1976). We have fully reviewed the record for these errors and find none.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Stewart

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Sep 20, 1984
453 So. 2d 1251 (La. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

State v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA, APPELLEE, v. SAMUEL STEWART, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Sep 20, 1984

Citations

453 So. 2d 1251 (La. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

State v. Terrase

However, in a recent writ grant, the Louisiana Supreme Court has indicated that even assignments so filed…