Opinion
Nos. 20150164 20150165.
02-18-2016
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Ryan Lee STENSAKER, Defendant and Appellant.
Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State's Attorney, Williams County State's Attorney Office, Williston, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Mark T. Blumer, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant.
Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State's Attorney, Williams County State's Attorney Office, Williston, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Mark T. Blumer, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
[¶ 1] Ryan Stensaker appeals after a jury found him guilty of murder and two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He argues the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to sustain the guilty verdicts; he asserts his convictions were improper because they were based entirely on circumstantial evidence. “A conviction may be justified on circumstantial evidence alone if the circumstantial evidence has such probative force as to enable the trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. A verdict based on circumstantial evidence carries the same presumption of correctness as other verdicts.” State v. Nakvinda, 2011 ND 217, ¶ 17, 807 N.W.2d 204 (citation omitted) (upholding murder conviction). See also State v. Olson, 290 N.W.2d 664, 670–71 (N.D.1980) (circumstantial evidence alone may justify a conviction; murder convicti5on upheld). We summarily affirm the conviction under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), and we remand the case to correct a clerical error. The judgment improperly states Stensaker was convicted of conspiracy to commit murder.
[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDEWALLE, C.J., CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, LISA FAIR McEVERS, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.