From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 10, 2004
861 A.2d 1178 (Conn. 2004)

Opinion

Proloy K. Das, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in opposition.

Decided November 10, 2004.


The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 96 (AC 23414), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of conviction based upon the trial court's failure to hold an evidentiary hearing pursuant to General Statutes § 54-86f?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 54-86f (1) requires that a defendant be permitted to introduce evidence of any semen that is found on the victim?

"3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a defendant whose defense is misidentification must be permitted to present evidence of semen from a third party without having to first show the relevance of that semen to the sexual assault?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17309.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 10, 2004
861 A.2d 1178 (Conn. 2004)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CARLETON SMITH

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Nov 10, 2004

Citations

861 A.2d 1178 (Conn. 2004)
271 Conn. 945

Citing Cases

State v. Smith

We granted the state's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issues: (1) "Did the…