From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 22, 1931
3 P.2d 153 (Okla. 1931)

Opinion

No. 20412

Opinion Filed September 22, 1931.

(Syllabus.)

Abatement and Revival — Death of Officer During Pendency of Proceedings for Removal.

Where a public official is charged by accusation of a grand jury seeking his removal from office, and during the pendency of said cause defendant dies, said cause will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Caddo County; T.G. Chambers, Assigned Judge.

Proceedings by the State to remove W.E. Smith, County Commissioner, from office. Motion to quash accusation sustained, and the State appeals. Upon death of defendant in error, cause dismissed.

Ted Morgan, Co. Atty. (A.J. Morris, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Melton Melton and Pruitt Wamsley, for defendant in error.


This is an appeal from the order of the district court of Caddo county sustaining a motion to quash the accusation against defendant. Defendant was a member of the board of county commissioners of Caddo county Okla., and as such the grand jury returned an accusation against him seeking his removal from office, to which accusation defendant's motion to quash was sustained.

Since the appeal has been lodged in this court, the defendant has died.

The only purpose to be accomplished in said cause would be the removal of defendant from office.

The death of defendant eliminates any necessity of further proceedings in said cause, and the same is hereby dismissed and abated.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. ANDREWS, J., absent.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 22, 1931
3 P.2d 153 (Okla. 1931)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. SMITH

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 22, 1931

Citations

3 P.2d 153 (Okla. 1931)
151 Okla. 183

Citing Cases

Hale v. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Seminole Cty

While we hold that this court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction in ouster-from-office cases, we allow this…