From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Singh

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Feb 10, 2015
862 N.W.2d 619 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

Nos. 2014AP846–CR, 2014AP847–CR, 2014AP1601 2014AP1602.

2015-02-10

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Aman Deep SINGH, Defendant–Appellant.

We agree and adopt this reasoning. See Wis. Ct.App. IOP VI(5)(a) (Jan. 1, 2013) (“When the [circuit] court's decision was based upon a written opinion ... of its grounds for decision that adequately express the panel's view of the law, the panel may incorporate the [circuit] court's opinion or statement of grounds, or make reference thereto.”). Because Singh has not shown that counsel's performance was deficient, we do not address prejudice. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697. Singh has not established either a Bangert or a Nelson/Bentley violation. 6



Summaries of

State v. Singh

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Feb 10, 2015
862 N.W.2d 619 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Aman Deep SINGH…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Feb 10, 2015

Citations

862 N.W.2d 619 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)
361 Wis. 2d 285
2015 WI App. 28