Opinion
Nos. 2014AP846–CR, 2014AP847–CR, 2014AP1601 2014AP1602.
2015-02-10
We agree and adopt this reasoning. See Wis. Ct.App. IOP VI(5)(a) (Jan. 1, 2013) (“When the [circuit] court's decision was based upon a written opinion ... of its grounds for decision that adequately express the panel's view of the law, the panel may incorporate the [circuit] court's opinion or statement of grounds, or make reference thereto.”). Because Singh has not shown that counsel's performance was deficient, we do not address prejudice. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697. Singh has not established either a Bangert or a Nelson/Bentley violation. 6