From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sherburne

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Aug 1, 1877
58 N.H. 159 (N.H. 1877)

Opinion

Decided August, 1877.

An indictment upon ss. 5, 6, 7, or 8, c. 259, Gen. St., is bad, if it does not show which one of those sections the defendant is accused of violating.

INDICTMENT, for obstructing a sheriff in the service of a capias. The court reserved the question of the sufficiency of the indictment.

Greene, solicitor, for the state.

Mugridge, for the defendant.


The indictment is not sufficient, upon s. 5, 6, or 7, c. 259, Gen. St., because it does not allege that the officer was engaged in the service of process in a civil case, or in any criminal case described in either of those sections. It is not sufficient, upon s. 8, because it does not allege that the officer was in the discharge of any duty of his office "in any case not included in the preceding sections."

Case discharged.

STANLEY, J., did not sit.


Summaries of

State v. Sherburne

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Aug 1, 1877
58 N.H. 159 (N.H. 1877)
Case details for

State v. Sherburne

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. SHERBURNE

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack

Date published: Aug 1, 1877

Citations

58 N.H. 159 (N.H. 1877)

Citing Cases

State v. Leavitt

State v. Messenger, 58 N.H. 348. Neither does it show which of the two sections the respondent is accused of…

State v. Langdon

Laws 1903, c. 122, s. 1, Laws 1905, c. 116, s. 1. The indictment would be bad for uncertainty. State v.…