From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Seibert

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 22, 1989
95 Or. App. 742 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

10-85-10469; CA A48099

Argued and submitted January 30, 1989

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing March 22, 1989

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lane County, Maurice K. Merten, Judge.

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of criminal mischief in the second degree, a Class A misdemeanor. ORS 164.354. The court suspended imposition of sentence and imposed five years' probation. Probation was revoked, and the court sentenced defendant to five years' imprisonment.

Defendant appeals, pursuant to ORS 138.050, which authorizes us to review to determine if the sentence exceeds the maximum allowable by law. The maximum penalty for a Class A misdemeanor is one year imprisonment, ORS 161.615, and a $2,500 fine. ORS 161.635. The sentence imposed obviously exceeds that allowable by law.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Seibert

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 22, 1989
95 Or. App. 742 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

State v. Seibert

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BLAINE LEONARD SEIBERT, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 22, 1989

Citations

95 Or. App. 742 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
770 P.2d 613

Citing Cases

People v. Denby

The court had no right to assume that the fact of vagrancy had been proven. (People v. Gordon , 88 Cal. 422,…