From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Seewalker

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Jun 24, 2011
799 N.W.2d 406 (N.D. 2011)

Opinion

No. 20100201.

Filed June 24, 2011.

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Pamela A. Nesvig, Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 5518, Bismarck, ND 58506-5518, for plaintiff and appellee.

Robert W. Martin, North Dakota Public Defenders' Office, 11 1st Ave. SW, Minot, ND 58701, for defendant and appellant.

Opinion of the Court by VandeWalle, Chief Justice.


[¶ 1] Philip James Seewalker appealed a criminal judgment and order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Seewalker argues the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Allan L. Schmalenberger, S. J.

[¶ 3] The Honorable Allan L. Schmalenberger, S. J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.


Summaries of

State v. Seewalker

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Jun 24, 2011
799 N.W.2d 406 (N.D. 2011)
Case details for

State v. Seewalker

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Phillip James Seewalker…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Jun 24, 2011

Citations

799 N.W.2d 406 (N.D. 2011)
2011 N.D. 123

Citing Cases

Valdez v. State

¶ 10 I concur, based on stare decisis, in the discussion dealing with ineffective counsel. SeeWalker v.…

Mitchell v. State

¶ 13 I concur, based on stare decisis, in the discussion dealing with ineffective counsel. SeeWalker v.…