From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ryon

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 17, 1976
278 Md. 302 (Md. 1976)

Summary

In State v. Ryon, 278 Md. 302, 363 A.2d 243 (1976), the Court of Appeals did not simply affirm our decision but expressly adopted the opinion of this Court in Ryon v. State as its own.

Summary of this case from Smith v. State

Opinion

[No. 2, September Term, 1976.]

Decided September 17, 1976.

Certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals. (Circuit Court for Harford County, Dyer, J.)

Minnie Sue Ryon was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree and from the judgment entered thereon appealed. On appeal to the Court of Special Appeals judgment was affirmed, certiorari denied by Court of Appeals. On certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States the judgment was vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Brown v. Illinois. The judgment was reversed by the Court of Special Appeals and certiorari was granted.

Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirmed with costs; mandate to issue forthwith.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE and ELDRIDGE, JJ.

James G. Klair, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and Clarence W. Sharp, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, for appellant.

Karl G. Feissner, Assigned Public Defender, with whom were Feissner, Garrity, Levan Schimel and Edward P. Camus, Public Defender for Prince George's County, on the brief, for appellee.


We granted a writ of certiorari in this case to review the decision of the Court of Special Appeals in Ryon v. State, 29 Md. App. 62, 349 A.2d 393 (1976), on remand to that court from the Supreme Court of the United States, Ryon v. Maryland, 422 U.S. 1054, 95 S.Ct. 2674, 45 L.Ed.2d 705 (1975). With the exception of the dicta contained in footnote 17 of the opinion of the Court of Special Appeals, pertaining to the retroactive application of Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975), we adopt, in accordance with Maryland Rule 811 d 3, the well-reasoned opinion of Chief Judge Orth (now an Associate Judge of this Court) in that case and affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.

Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirmed with costs; mandate to issue forthwith.


Summaries of

State v. Ryon

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 17, 1976
278 Md. 302 (Md. 1976)

In State v. Ryon, 278 Md. 302, 363 A.2d 243 (1976), the Court of Appeals did not simply affirm our decision but expressly adopted the opinion of this Court in Ryon v. State as its own.

Summary of this case from Smith v. State

In State v. Ryon, 278 Md. 302, 363 A.2d 243 (1976), the Court of Appeals did not simply affirm but adopted (with the exception of one footnote not here relevant) the opinion of this Court in Ryon v. State.

Summary of this case from Bartram v. State
Case details for

State v. Ryon

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MARYLAND v . RYON

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Sep 17, 1976

Citations

278 Md. 302 (Md. 1976)
363 A.2d 243

Citing Cases

Sydnor v. State

Appellant first contends "that the action of the two police officers in taking him into custody in St. Mary's…

Souffie v. State

Predominant and preliminary among the eleven issues raised by appellant is the admissibility of the pretrial…