State v. Rumley

Full title: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT THOMAS RUMLEY…

Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 9, 2019

295 Or. App. 667 (Or. Ct. App. 2019)

432 P.3d 1204

Opinion

A164006

01-09-2019

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert Thomas RUMLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Wayne Mackeson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the brief was Wayne Mackeson, PC. Adam Holbrook, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Mackeson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the brief was Wayne Mackeson, PC.

Adam Holbrook, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.

PER CURIAMAffirmed. See State v. Donathan , 281 Or. App. 781, 383 P.3d 946 (2016), rev. den. , 360 Or. 752, 388 P.3d 724 (2017) (construing ORS 813.010(5), a statute worded similarly to ORS 813.011(1), and concluding that the term "conviction" includes a finding of guilt); State v. Turntine , 265 Or. App. 323, 336 P.3d 513 (2014), rev. den. , 356 Or. 690, 344 P.3d 1112 (2015) (likewise applying principles of statutory construction to conclude that the term "convicted" in ORS 163.160(3) includes a finding of guilt).