From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ruelas

Supreme Court of Arizona
Oct 5, 1990
798 P.2d 1307 (Ariz. 1990)

Opinion

No. CR-90-0126-PR.

October 5, 1990.


ORDER

The Petition for Review has been considered by the Court. Now, therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Review is denied as to issues Nos. 1, 2, and 4.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is granted as to issue No. 3 and that pursuant to Rule 23(i)(2), Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S., this issue, insofar as it pertains to the admissibility of the alleged victim's hearsay statement under the so-called "residual exception" to the hearsay rule, is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Idaho v. Wright, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 110 S.Ct. 3139, 3148-49, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990).


Summaries of

State v. Ruelas

Supreme Court of Arizona
Oct 5, 1990
798 P.2d 1307 (Ariz. 1990)
Case details for

State v. Ruelas

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Robert L. RUELAS, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: Oct 5, 1990

Citations

798 P.2d 1307 (Ariz. 1990)
798 P.2d 1307

Citing Cases

State v. Lopez

Before granting the state's motion in limine, the court heard testimony from David himself, who revealed that…