From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Mar 24, 1972
196 N.W.2d 118 (Neb. 1972)

Opinion

No. 38194.

Filed March 24, 1972.

Criminal Law: Statutes: Sentences. Where a criminal statute is amended by mitigating the punishment, after the commission of a prohibited act but before final judgment, the punishment is that provided by the amendatory act unless the Legislature has specifically provided otherwise.

Appeal from the district court for Hall County: DONALD H. WEAVER, Judge. Affirmed as modified.

Thomas D. Anderson, for appellant.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Betsy G. Berger, for appellee.

Heard before WHITE, C. J., SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, SMITH, McCOWN, NEWTON, and CLINTON, JJ.


Defendant, Robert Ray Roberts, pled guilty to Count I, for possession, and Count II, for sale of marijuana. When defendant appeared for sentencing on June 4, 1971, Count I was dismissed, and defendant was sentenced for a period of 2 to 5 years in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex on Count II. This was the penalty and sentence provided for a violation of section 28-472.02, R. S. Supp., 1969, which section was repealed, effective May 26, 1971. The new sections, 28-4,115 (14) and 28-4,125 (2), R. S. Supp., 1971, became effective May 26, 1971.

Defendant alleges two assignments of error: "1. The District Court erred in imposing a sentence which was contrary to law. 2. The District Court erred in imposing an unduly severe sentence without proper consideration and weight to the facts and circumstances in mitigation of the offense."

This court has recently ruled, in State v. Randolph, 186 Neb. 297, 183 N.W.2d 225 (1971), and State v. Goham, 187 Neb. 34, 187 N.W.2d 305 (1971), that where a criminal statute is amended by mitigating the punishment, after the commission of a prohibited act but before final judgment, the punishment is that provided by the amendatory act unless the Legislature has specifically provided otherwise. This rule applies herein.

We have reviewed the presentence report on the defendant and are satisfied that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing the defendant to the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex.

We affirm the judgment of conviction herein, but modify the sentence to 1 to 5 years in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.


Summaries of

State v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Mar 24, 1972
196 N.W.2d 118 (Neb. 1972)
Case details for

State v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. ROBERT RAY ROBERTS, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Mar 24, 1972

Citations

196 N.W.2d 118 (Neb. 1972)
196 N.W.2d 118

Citing Cases

State v. Weinacht

We have reiterated the above rule in many subsequent cases. See, for example, State v. Goham, 187 Neb. 34,…

State v. Anderson

It is evident from the record the defendant entered into a plea bargain on the assumption that if probation…