State v. Ritter

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Willie Ritter, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 18, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2012-210570 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 18, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-210570 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-232

06-18-2014

The State, Respondent, v. Willie Ritter, Appellant.

William Bertram Von Herrmann, of Von Herrmann Law Firm, of Conway, for Appellant. Assistant Deputy Attorney General David A. Spencer, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Richland County

Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

William Bertram Von Herrmann, of Von Herrmann Law Firm, of Conway, for Appellant.

Assistant Deputy Attorney General David A. Spencer, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP ("Except for motions for new trials based on after-discovered evidence, post-trial motions shall be made within ten (10) days after the imposition of the sentence."); State v. Warren, 392 S.C. 235, 240, 708 S.E.2d 234, 236 (Ct. App. 2011) (holding the trial court only had authority to consider the issue raised in a timely filed post-trial motion and lacked authority to consider the issue in a motion to amend filed more than three years later). AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.