From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ricks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Jan 21, 2014
754 S.E.2d 259 (N.C. Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

In Ricks, the defendant was charged under a statute which required that the State prove that the defendant knew that the rifle was, in fact, stolen.

Summary of this case from State v. Oxendine

Opinion

No. COA12–1476.

2014-01-21

STATE of North Carolina v. Travis RICKS, Defendant.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Kimberley A. D'Arruda, for the State. Anna S. Lucas for defendant-appellant.



Summaries of

State v. Ricks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Jan 21, 2014
754 S.E.2d 259 (N.C. Ct. App. 2014)

In Ricks, the defendant was charged under a statute which required that the State prove that the defendant knew that the rifle was, in fact, stolen.

Summary of this case from State v. Oxendine
Case details for

State v. Ricks

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Travis RICKS, Defendant.

Court:Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Date published: Jan 21, 2014

Citations

754 S.E.2d 259 (N.C. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

State v. Oxendine

Therefore, Harris is inapplicable.The dissent also relies upon this Court's unpublished opinion in State v.…