From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Revelo

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 7, 1999
743 A.2d 617 (Conn. 1999)

Opinion

(16226)

Alix C. Walmsley, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Decided December 7, 1999


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 217 (AC 17757), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the defendant's claim of judicial vindictiveness subsequent to his plea of nolo contendere, and, if not, were the defendant's due process rights violated when the trial court sentenced him to a greater period of incarceration after the denial of his suppression motion than it would have if he had waived his right to a determination of his suppression claim and entered his nolo plea prior to a determination of that claim?"


Summaries of

State v. Revelo

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 7, 1999
743 A.2d 617 (Conn. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Revelo

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. HECTOR REVELO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 7, 1999

Citations

743 A.2d 617 (Conn. 1999)
743 A.2d 617

Citing Cases

State v. Revelo

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal limited to the issue of whether the Appellate…