From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reid

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 2, 1989
542 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-510.

May 2, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Allen Kornblum, J.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Margarita Muina Febres and Joan Greenberg, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Lamons, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, John Lipinski, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.


The state appeals an order of the trial court granting Everald Montgomery Reid's motion to dismiss the information charging Reid with, inter alia, carrying a concealed firearm. There exists a genuine issue of material fact concerning the extent to which the firearm in question was concealed by Reid's shirt. "[A] completely revealed weapon would not be a concealed weapon, and dismissal on motion would be proper. But it does not follow that a weapon, in order to be concealed, must be completely concealed." State v. Sellers, 281 So.2d 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); see also State v. Joseph, 506 So.2d 493 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). The weapon could have been concealed; it is for the jury to determine whether it was concealed. Joseph, 506 So.2d at 494. We need not reach the state's remaining point on appeal concerning the sufficiency of the jurat.

The order of dismissal is quashed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Order quashed; remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

State v. Reid

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 2, 1989
542 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

State v. Reid

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. EVERALD MONTGOMERY REID, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 2, 1989

Citations

542 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

State v. Rosenberg

Moreover, in this case there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding the confidential nature of the…

State v. Presume

Thus, in the instant case, the combination of (1) the state's sworn traverse, specifically denying Presume's…