From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ramon A. G.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 2019
333 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

09-17-2019

STATE of Connecticut v. RAMON A. G.

Jennifer B. Smith, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. James M. Ralls, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Jennifer B. Smith, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

James M. Ralls, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 190 Conn. App. 483, 211 A.3d 82 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the defendant's claim of instructional error was not preserved?

"2. If the answer to the first question is ‘no,’ did the Appellate Court incorrectly conclude that the defendant had implicitly waived his instructional claim pursuant to State v. Kitchens, 299 Conn. 447, 10 A.3d 942 (2011) ?"


Summaries of

State v. Ramon A. G.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 2019
333 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Ramon A. G.

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. RAMON A. G.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 17, 2019

Citations

333 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2019)
215 A.3d 735

Citing Cases

State v. Ramon G.

(Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ramon A. G. , 333 Conn. 909, 215 A.3d 735 (2019). We note that…

State v. Magaraci

Because the defendant implicitly waived his instructional claim, he cannot obtain relief under Golding . See…