From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Prieto

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 17, 1985
479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 85-848.

December 17, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Howard Gross, Judge.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Howard Sohn, Miami, for appellee Raul Nieves.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.


The state appeals the trial court's determination that State v. Glosson, 462 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1985), required dismissal of the criminal charges against defendants, Roberto Prieto and Raul Nieves. Dismissal of an information is not required under Glosson where, as here, payment to the confidential informant was contingent on the quantity of drugs seized and not on cooperation and trial testimony in the resulting criminal prosecution. We therefore hold that the trial court improperly dismissed the information. We reverse and remand as to both defendants.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Prieto

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 17, 1985
479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

State v. Prieto

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. ROBERTO PRIETO AND RAUL NIEVES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 17, 1985

Citations

479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

State v. Ruiz

The prosecutor indicated below and the attorney general has emphasized here that the confidential informant…

Taylor v. State

The same incentive to color testimony or commit perjury is not present in this case, and accordingly, there…