From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Price

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 8, 1994
637 So. 2d 383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 91-03781.

June 8, 1994.

Appeal from the County Court for Pinellas County; Henry J. Andringa, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Paver, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellee.


Based upon two recent decisions of the supreme court, we reverse this case and remand it for further proceedings in the county court.

Two issues were argued in this appeal. The first issue presented was whether the HRS rules governing inspections of breath testing instruments are unconstitutionally vague. In State v. Veilleux, 635 So.2d 977 (Fla. 1994), the supreme court concluded that the rules were not unconstitutionally vague. See also State v. Berger, 605 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The second issue presented was whether this court improvidently accepted jurisdiction of this appeal. The supreme court's decision in Blore v. Fierro, 636 So.2d 1329, (Fla. 1994), established that this court had jurisdiction.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in the county court.

HALL, A.C.J., and PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Price

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 8, 1994
637 So. 2d 383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Price

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL PRICE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 8, 1994

Citations

637 So. 2d 383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)