From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Philip Morris Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 2000
269 A.D.2d 268 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 23, 2000

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered August 23, 1999, which denied the proposed intervenors' motion to intervene as untimely, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Brian J. Shoot, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Marjorie Press Lindbloom, for Defendants-Respondents.

Peter A. Mahler, for Proposed Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellants.

ROSENBERGER, J.P., NARDELLI, MAZZARELLI, WALLACH, RUBIN, JJ.


The IAS court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion to intervene as untimely since the proposed intervenors submitted their motion eight months after the IAS court entered its order approving the Master Settlement Agreement and more than a month after this Court affirmed that order (see, CPLR 1012; 1013).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

State v. Philip Morris Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 2000
269 A.D.2d 268 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Philip Morris Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF NEW YORK, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PHILIP MORRIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 23, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 268 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 829

Citing Cases

State v. Philip Morris Incorporated

In his order of October 22, 1999, Justice Crane denied the motion as untimely stating "the case is finally…

In re Rosenthal

Thus, there is no basis to vacate the order underlying movants' application. Turning to the merits of the…