From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Peluso

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 8, 2019
331 Conn. 924 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

05-08-2019

STATE of Connecticut v. Bernard J. PELUSO

ROBINSON, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. James P. Sexton and Megan L. Wade, in support of the petition.


ROBINSON, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

James P. Sexton and Megan L. Wade, in support of the petition.

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it found that the state had demonstrated ‘good cause’ to amend the information after the commencement of trial, as required by Practice Book § 38-18 ?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the defendant failed to demonstrate that the state's amendment to the information caused prejudice to his substantive rights, in violation of Practice Book § 38-18 ?"


Summaries of

State v. Peluso

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 8, 2019
331 Conn. 924 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Peluso

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Bernard J. PELUSO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 8, 2019

Citations

331 Conn. 924 (Conn. 2019)
207 A.3d 518

Citing Cases

State v. Peluso

Thereafter, the defendant filed a petition for certification to appeal, which we granted, limited to the…