From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Patrick

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Sep 10, 2015
871 N.W.2d 703 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

preserving ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim alleging inadequate rule 2.19 colloquy for possible postconviction-relief proceedings

Summary of this case from State v. Davenport

Opinion

No. 13–1575.

09-10-2015

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Ty Andre PATRICK, Defendant–Appellant.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Maria L. Ruhtenberg, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Jean C. Pettinger, Assistant Attorney General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and Joseph D. Crisp, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Patrick

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Sep 10, 2015
871 N.W.2d 703 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

preserving ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim alleging inadequate rule 2.19 colloquy for possible postconviction-relief proceedings

Summary of this case from State v. Davenport
Case details for

State v. Patrick

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Ty Andre PATRICK…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Sep 10, 2015

Citations

871 N.W.2d 703 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

State v. Davenport

tate was ready and able to prove-up his prior convictions, and consequently, Davenport has failed to…