From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Paola

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 28, 1985
704 P.2d 550 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

43554 S; CA A34777

Argued and submitted June 28, 1985.

Reversed and remanded for new trial August 28, 1985.

Appeal from District Court, Clackamas County, Robert L. Mills, Judge.

H. Richard Sause, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Defendant appeals his conviction, after trial to the court, for driving under the influence of intoxicants. He contends that he did not effectively waive his constitutional and statutory rights to a jury trial. The state concedes that no written jury trial waiver was executed and that the judgment must be reversed. State v. Van Lieu, 48 Or. App. 671, 617 P.2d 914 (1980); State v. Wiik, 31 Or. App. 571, 570 P.2d 1021 (1977), rev den 281 Or. 323 (1978).

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Summaries of

State v. Paola

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 28, 1985
704 P.2d 550 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

State v. Paola

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ANTHONY PAOLA, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 28, 1985

Citations

704 P.2d 550 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
704 P.2d 550

Citing Cases

LaMarche v. State of Oregon

In similar circumstances we have, on direct appeal from a conviction, remanded for a new trial. State v.…