Opinion
68851-1-I
03-04-2013
STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. EDGAR C. PACHECO, Appellant.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Per Curiam.
Edgar Pacheco appeals his conviction for felony harassment. He contends the information was defective for failing to allege that he made a "true threat." His contention is controlled by the State Supreme Court's recent decision in State v. Allen, No. 86119-6, 2013 WL 259383 (Wash. Jan. 24, 2013) ("true threat" concept defines the threat element of an offense; it is not itself an element that must be included in either the information or the to-convict instruction).
Affirmed.