From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Novoa

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 25, 1992
610 A.2d 179 (Conn. 1992)

Opinion

Decided June 25, 1992


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 596, is granted, limited to the following question:

"In the circumstances of this case, was the use of wiretap evidence permitted by the provisions of General Statutes 54-41p (b) and 54-41b?"

Bruce A. Sturman, public defender, in support of the petition.

Kevin T. Kane, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Novoa

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 25, 1992
610 A.2d 179 (Conn. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Novoa

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ROSALBINA NOVOA

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 25, 1992

Citations

610 A.2d 179 (Conn. 1992)
610 A.2d 179

Citing Cases

State v. Novoa

We granted permission to appeal on the following certified issue: "In the circumstances of this case, was the…