From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Norman

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 9, 2011
365 N.C. 360 (N.C. 2011)

Summary

holding that the witness's "extensive practical experience" in the relevant fields qualified him to testify as an expert despite his lack of a formal degree

Summary of this case from State v. Holmes

Opinion

No. 323P11.

2011-11-9

STATE of North Carolina v. Ricky Dean NORMAN.

William D. Auman, for Norman, Ricky Dean. Kathryn E. Hathcock, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.


William D. Auman, for Norman, Ricky Dean. Kathryn E. Hathcock, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th of July 2011 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of November 2011.”


Summaries of

State v. Norman

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 9, 2011
365 N.C. 360 (N.C. 2011)

holding that the witness's "extensive practical experience" in the relevant fields qualified him to testify as an expert despite his lack of a formal degree

Summary of this case from State v. Holmes
Case details for

State v. Norman

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Ricky Dean NORMAN.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

365 N.C. 360 (N.C. 2011)
718 S.E.2d 401

Citing Cases

Norman v. Hooks

On November 9, 2011, the North Carolina Supreme Court denied the Petitioner's petition for discretionary…

State v. Holmes

While Kale lacked a post-secondary degree in electrical engineering, we have never required such a formal…