From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Nevills

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 6, 1981
620 P.2d 509 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 79-66C, CA 17763

Argued and submitted November 26, 1980

Affirmed December 22, 1980 Reconsideration denied January 29, 1981 Petition for review denied October 6, 1981 ( 291 Or. 708)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Klamath County.

Ted Abram, Judge.

Enver Bozgoz, Klamath Falls, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

John C. Bradley, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James M. Brown, Attorney General, John R. McCulloch, Jr., Solicitor General, and William F. Gary, Deputy Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Buttler, Judges.


Affirmed. State v. Patton, 47 Or. App. 169, 613 P.2d 1102 (1980).

BUTTLER, J., dissenting opinion.


I respectfully dissent for the same reasons I stated in my dissent in State v. Brown, 49 Or. App. 75, 618 P.2d 1318 (1980).


Summaries of

State v. Nevills

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 6, 1981
620 P.2d 509 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

State v. Nevills

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MONTE LANE NEVILLS, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 6, 1981

Citations

620 P.2d 509 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
620 P.2d 509