concluding that phrase " ‘you have been arrested’ " on "Informing the Accused form specifically advised [defendant] that he was under arrest" and "was sufficient to meet the arrest requirement" of state's implied consent law
Summary of this case from State v. DucharmeNo. 04-1546-CR.
December 28, 2004.
Unpublished opinion. Affirmed.
concluding that phrase " ‘you have been arrested’ " on "Informing the Accused form specifically advised [defendant] that he was under arrest" and "was sufficient to meet the arrest requirement" of state's implied consent law
Summary of this case from State v. DucharmeFull title:STATE v. NELSON
Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Date published: Dec 28, 2004
de that, because the officer had probable cause to arrest the defendant for DUI, and because the defendant…