From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mortimore

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 23, 1988
764 P.2d 960 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

B71-526; CA A47988

Argued and submitted August 24, 1988

Affirmed November 23, 1988

Appeal from the District Court, Lane County, Bryan T. Hodges, Judge.

Charles M. Gudger, III, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Graber, Judge, and Van Hoomissen, Judge pro tempore.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Defendant raises objections to conditions of probation imposed by the trial court. Assuming that those conditions are reviewable, in the trial court, we will not consider them for the first time on appeal. State v. Kidd, 61 Or. App. 292, 656 P.2d 391 (1983).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Mortimore

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 23, 1988
764 P.2d 960 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Mortimore

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MATTHEW MORTIMORE, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 23, 1988

Citations

764 P.2d 960 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)
764 P.2d 960

Citing Cases

State v. Hagger

The state concedes that condition 5 does not comply with ORS 137.540(2), but argues that defendant did not…

State v. Gilbertson

Defendant filed a motion to modify the conditions in the trial court, which was denied. Accordingly, we may…