From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Modery

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Nov 1, 1988
549 A.2d 741 (Me. 1988)

Opinion

Submitted on Briefs September 12, 1988.

Decided November 1, 1988.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Penobscot County.

R. Christopher Almy, Dist. Atty., Philip C. Worden, Asst. Dist. Atty., Bangor, for plaintiff.

Robert R. Modery, Orono, pro se.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD and HORNBY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Defendant, Robert Modery, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, (Penobscot County; Pierson, J.), affirming his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or while having 0.10% or more by weight of alcohol in his blood, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Supp. 1987), in the District Court, (Bangor; Cox, J.).

Modery's claim that the result of the breath test was improperly admitted against him is without merit. The District Court did not commit error in concluding that the police officer's stop of Modery's motor vehicle was supported by specific and articulable facts leading to a suspicion that a crime was being committed. State v. Garland, 482 A.2d 139, 142 (Me. 1984). Modery's contention that the breath test was tainted because the certificate stating the results was improperly notarized is without merit. In addition, the District Court did not err in denying Modery's motion for a new trial. State v. Preston, 521 A.2d 305, 306-07 (Me. 1987).

The entry is:

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

All concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Modery

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Nov 1, 1988
549 A.2d 741 (Me. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Modery

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Robert R. MODERY

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Nov 1, 1988

Citations

549 A.2d 741 (Me. 1988)

Citing Cases

State v. Kneeland

That only invites lawyers to try to show that their case, or a part of it, is like Caron and prolong the…