State v. Mitchell

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Eric C. Mitchell, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: May 30, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-328 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-328

05-30-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Eric C. Mitchell, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Eric C. Mitchell appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court's questioning during the probation revocation hearing violated his due process rights and constituted a breach of the separation of powers doctrine. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.