From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mills

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 6, 2021
No. 2021-UP-3471 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-3471 Appellate Case 2019-000915

10-06-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Quintin Mills, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2021

Appeal From Calhoun County Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Mills

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 6, 2021
No. 2021-UP-3471 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 6, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Quintin Mills, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 6, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-UP-3471 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 6, 2021)