From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 10, 2012
54 A.3d 179 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-10-10

STATE of Connecticut v. Herbert CLARK.

Richard E. Condon, Jr., senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Sarah Hanna, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Richard E. Condon, Jr., senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Sarah Hanna, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 137 Conn.App. 203, 48 A.3d 135, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the admission of the defendant's record of prior convictions constituted harmless error?”


Summaries of

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 10, 2012
54 A.3d 179 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

State v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Herbert CLARK.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 10, 2012

Citations

54 A.3d 179 (Conn. 2012)
307 Conn. 915

Citing Cases

State v. Clark

We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court. See State v. Clark, 307 Conn. 915,…