From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Middleton

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 9, 1977
232 S.E.2d 342 (S.C. 1977)

Opinion

20360

February 9, 1977.

Appeal from General Sessions Court, Charleston County; James A. Spruill, Judge.

Messrs. Coming B. Gibbs, Jr. and Mark C. Tanenbaum, of Charleston, for Appellant.

Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., and Joseph R. Barker, of Columbia, and Robert B. Wallace, Sol., and A. Arthur Rosenblum, Asst. Sol., of Charleston, for Respondent.


February 9, 1977.


On October 4, 1976, the Supreme Court of the United States entered an order granting the appellant's petition for a writ of certiorari and vacated the judgment of this Court affirming the appellant's conviction. See State v. Middleton, 266 S.C. 251, 222 S.E.2d 763 (1976). The Supreme Court of the United States remanded for further consideration in light of Doyle and Wood v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).

We conclude that Doyle and Wood v. Ohio, supra, is inapposite to the instant case. Therefore, we reaffirm the conviction and sentence of Middleton.

Reaffirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Middleton

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 9, 1977
232 S.E.2d 342 (S.C. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Middleton

Case Details

Full title:The STATE Respondent, v. Frank MIDDLETON, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 9, 1977

Citations

232 S.E.2d 342 (S.C. 1977)
232 S.E.2d 342

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

me Court in People v. Collie (1981) 30 Cal.3d 43, 55, footnote 7 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 458, 634 P.2d 534, 23…

People v. Goforth

The courts of other states have relied on Matlock and determined that a parent had sufficient "common…