From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McLerran

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Jul 8, 2004
122 Wn. App. 1022 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

In McLerran, for instance, the evidence found by police included coffee filters with sludge containing completed methamphetamine and its principal byproduct, slip op. at 2, and in Zunker, it included pseudoephedrine pills that had been ground up in a preparatory step to the process.

Summary of this case from Honeycutt v. State

Opinion

No. 21841-4-III.

July 8, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 02-1-00313-7, Robert G. Swisher, J., entered January 28, 2003.


Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Kato, C.J., and Kurtz, J.


Summaries of

State v. McLerran

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Jul 8, 2004
122 Wn. App. 1022 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004)

In McLerran, for instance, the evidence found by police included coffee filters with sludge containing completed methamphetamine and its principal byproduct, slip op. at 2, and in Zunker, it included pseudoephedrine pills that had been ground up in a preparatory step to the process.

Summary of this case from Honeycutt v. State
Case details for

State v. McLerran

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. SEAN CLAUDE McLERRAN, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three

Date published: Jul 8, 2004

Citations

122 Wn. App. 1022 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004)
122 Wash. App. 1022

Citing Cases

Honeycutt v. State

Case law in at least one other state holds that a jury may reasonably infer that manufacturing occurred where…