From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McIntosh

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1870
64 N.C. 607 (N.C. 1870)

Opinion

June Term, 1870.

Upon the trial of issues in proceedings for bastardy the defendant is a competent witness.

SPECIAL proceedings for bastardy, tried before Cannon, J., at Fall Term 1869 of YANCEY Court.

Phillips Merrimon for the appellant.

F. H. Busbee contra.


Upon the trial of the issues, the defendant tendered himself as a witness, but his Honor excluded him, as incompetent. The defendant excepted.

Verdict, Guilty; Judgment accordingly, and Appeal by the defendant.


A proceeding in bastardy, is a civil action, as distinguished from a criminal action: Const. Art. IV, § 1.

Under the Code of Civil Procedure, it is a special proceeding, as distinguished from a civil action proper. In such special proceeding a party may be examined as a witness in his own behalf: C.C.P. §§ 342-3; State v. Waldrop, 63 N.C. 507; State v. Pate, 44 N.C. 244.

There was error in the ruling of his Honor, and there must be a venire de novo upon the issue submitted.

Let this be certified.

Per curiam.

Venire de novo.

Cited: S. v. Hickerson, 72 N.C. 422; S. v. Crouse, 86 N.C. 619; S. v. Ballard, 122 N.C. 1028; S. v. Liles, 134 N.C. 737.

(608)


Summaries of

State v. McIntosh

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1870
64 N.C. 607 (N.C. 1870)
Case details for

State v. McIntosh

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE v. DANIEL R. McINTOSH

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1870

Citations

64 N.C. 607 (N.C. 1870)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Tidline v. Hickerson

Depositions are admissible in evidence on the trial of an issue in Bastardy, as they are in other civil…

State v. Liles

Accordingly, we find that in an unbroken line of decisions, down to and including S. v. Edwards, 110 N.C. 511…