From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Apr 27, 2012
87 So. 3d 857 (La. 2012)

Summary

concluding that there was no unlawful driving on the basis of a video, notwithstanding the testimony of an officer that there was

Summary of this case from State v. Martinez

Opinion

No. 2011–KK–2670.

2012-04-27

STATE of Louisiana v. James A. McCORMICK.


In re State of Louisiana;—Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 06–F–18533; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46912–KW.
PER CURIAM.

[2011-2670 (La. 1]Granted. The trial court's order vacating respondent's sentence and assigning the case for resentencing is reversed and respondent's original term of imprisonment is reinstated subject to amendment in accord with the law. Correction of respondent's sentence on his motion to impose the mandatory fine of $5,000 required by La.R.S. 14:98(E)(1)(a), presents the need only for ministerial correction of the record which the court may accomplish without the necessity of vacating the original sentence and resentencing the defendant altogether. State v. Harris, 93–1098, p. 1 (La.1/5/96), 665 So.2d 1164 (“In the absence of an articulable basis for concluding that the district court imposed sentence under a misapprehension of what the law required or of its full range of sentencing discretion, we will presume that the failure of the court expressly to impose the special restrictions required by law ( e.g., parole disability) presents the need only for ministerial correction of the record.”) (overruling [2011-2670 (La. 2]State v. Husband, 593 So.2d 1257 (La.1992); State v. Desdunes, 579 So.2d 452 (La.1991)). The present record reflects the trial court's acknowledgement that it “just forgot” about the fine when it imposed sentence. Accordingly, the district court is directed to make the necessary changes in the minutes to reflect that respondent's sentence also includes the mandatory fine of $5000, subject to any additional term of imprisonment authorized by La.C.Cr.P. art. 884 for non-payment of the fine, and to send the new minutes to the relevant prison authorities.


Summaries of

State v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Apr 27, 2012
87 So. 3d 857 (La. 2012)

concluding that there was no unlawful driving on the basis of a video, notwithstanding the testimony of an officer that there was

Summary of this case from State v. Martinez
Case details for

State v. McCormick

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Louisiana v. James A. McCORMICK.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

87 So. 3d 857 (La. 2012)

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

The details of the traffic stop were related by Colvin during the suppression hearing for Collins. For a…

State v. Martinez

We find such reasoning persuasive in this case. See also State v. Collins, 45,979, p. 3 (La.App. 2 Cir.…