From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McClinton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 17, 2021
No. 2021-UP-410 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-410 Appellate Case 2020-000243

11-17-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Quinton Tywan McClinton, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted November 1, 2021

Appeal From Chester County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. McClinton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 17, 2021
No. 2021-UP-410 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2021)
Case details for

State v. McClinton

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Quinton Tywan McClinton, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-UP-410 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2021)