From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mayo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 5, 2000
763 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 99-0456

Opinion filed January 5, 2000 JULY TERM 1999

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Royce Agner, Judge; L.T. No. 98-12264 CF10A.

Robert L. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and David J. McPherrin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The state appeals the trial court's downward departure sentence imposed on Jeffrey Mayo after he entered a plea of nolo contendere to I) dealing in cocaine and II) resisting without violence. We reverse.

Mayo's plea agreement provided for an open plea and a guideline recommended range of between 29.85 months and 30 years. The court heard testimony on the issue of remorse and orally pronounced sentence of 29.85 months. Mayo then cited State v. Northern, 503 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) as support for a downward departure because his crime involved only $20 of crack cocaine. Northern is no longer good law in light of Atwaters v. State, 519 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1988) which held the quantity of drugs involved in a crime may not be used to support a departure from the guidelines. See id. at 612. After reviewing Northern, the trial court receded from its previously announced sentence, and sentenced Mayo to one year and one day.

Mayo concedes the quantity of cocaine was an invalid reason for departure, but argues the record is unclear whether the departure sentence was based in part on a finding of remorse. "An appellate court is obliged to uphold a departure sentence if one of the reasons for the departure is valid, even if the remaining departure reasons are invalid. See § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1995)." Perry v. State, 714 So.2d 563, 564 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). In our view the record shows the trial court would not have departed from the guidelines were it not for the invalid reason of the quantity of drugs involved.

Mayo's sentence is reversed and remanded to allow Mayo the opportunity to withdraw his plea and go to trial or be sentenced within the guidelines. See State v. Silver, 723 So.2d 381 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

STONE, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Mayo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 5, 2000
763 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Mayo

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. JEFFREY MAYO, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 5, 2000

Citations

763 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)