holding department of corrections notified defendant his mail would be read, thus, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his letters
Summary of this case from Com. v. MooreDecided September 18, 2003
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 778 (AC 22976), is denied.
James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
holding department of corrections notified defendant his mail would be read, thus, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his letters
Summary of this case from Com. v. MooreFull title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CARLTON MARTIN
Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date published: Sep 18, 2003
There is, however, no constitutional violation. See State v. Martin , 77 Conn. App. 778, 800, 825 A.2d 835…
Martin v. Warden, State PrisonThe petitioner, Carlton Martin, seeks habeas corpus relief from a total, effective sentence of ninety years…