From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Martin

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Nov 17, 1993
626 So. 2d 961 (La. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. Cr93-306.

November 17, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF VERNON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE TED R. BROYLES, J.

Asa Allen Skinner, Leesville, for the State.

Alvin Charles Dowden Jr., Leesville, for Angela and Wendell Martin.

Before GUIDRY, STOKER and DECUIR, JJ.


Defendants' only assignment of error urges excessiveness of his sentence and failure to grant his Motion to Reconsider. We find no error in the trial court's ruling. The record was reviewed for errors patent and two were found. In the first the bill of information was not amended to reflect the charge to which defendant, Wendell Martin, pled. As the defendants did not raise this issue on appeal and the plea was to a lesser included offense of the offense charged, this is harmless error. See State v. Barclay, 591 So.2d 1178 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1991). The second error is the trial court's failure to give the defendants credit for time served prior to imposition of sentence. The trial court erred in failing to award this credit.

Accordingly, the defendants' convictions and the sentences imposed are affirmed and the matter remanded to the trial court to amend the commitment and minute entry of the sentence to reflect that defendants are given credit for time served.

Affirmed and Remanded with Instructions.


Summaries of

State v. Martin

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Nov 17, 1993
626 So. 2d 961 (La. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WENDELL ANGELA MARTIN…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Nov 17, 1993

Citations

626 So. 2d 961 (La. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

State v. Douglas

State v. Green, 610 So.2d 808 (La. 1993). See also State v. Martin, 626 So.2d 961 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1993).…

State v. Bailey

However, even if error occurred, it would clearly be harmless. State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La. 11/29/05), 916…